![]() The (EFF) and the (FSF) consider the use of DRM systems to be an. ![]() DRM can also restrict users from exercising their under the copyright law, such as backing up copies of CDs or DVDs (instead having to buy another copy, if it can still be purchased), lending materials out through a library, accessing works in the public domain, or using copyrighted materials for research and education under the, and under French law. Those opposed to DRM contend there is no evidence that DRM helps prevent copyright infringement, arguing instead that it serves only to inconvenience legitimate customers, and that DRM helps stifle innovation and competition.įurthermore, works can become permanently inaccessible if the DRM scheme changes or if the service is discontinued. ![]() Proponents of DRM argue that it is necessary to prevent from being copied freely, just as physical locks are needed to prevent personal property from being stolen, that it can help the copyright holder maintain, and that it can ensure continued revenue streams. The use of digital rights management is not universally accepted. DRM technologies try to control the use, modification, and distribution of copyrighted works (such as software and multimedia content), as well as systems within devices that enforce these policies.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |